Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Bb/100 Hands..
FCP Poker Forum > Poker Strategy Forum > Omaha Poker
JoeyFinngars
What is a decent BB/100 hands rating for PLO?

I have about 3500 hands at my current level and want to know what a good player would average per 100 hands...
Zach6668
I don't know, but I know 3500 hands won't tell you anything about your own winrate.
simo_8ball
>0BB/100 is good with rakeback.
meservery
QUOTE (simo_8ball @ Friday, May 4th, 2007, 7:07 PM) *
>0BB/100 is good with rakeback.

LOL.

I was gonna say anything that doesnt begin with a Negative Symbol... but I didnt think thats what JOey was after.
JoeyFinngars
thanks guys...


I understand 3500 isnt a large sample but it is better than 350 hands
simo_8ball
10BB/100 is a very good winrate, but you need a BIG sample size.
Zach6668
QUOTE (JoeyFinngars @ Saturday, May 5th, 2007, 2:22 PM) *
thanks guys...
I understand 3500 isnt a large sample but it is better than 350 hands

I mean, 3500 will show you if you were winning over your last 3500 hands, but it won't tell you anything about your long term winrate. Hell, I played 2368 hands yesterday alone, and lost money, and I'm pretty sure I'm a winning player long term... so you catch my drift.

For long term winrate, a lot of people used to say 10,000 to get a decent approximation, but honestly, I've got through 25,000 hand downswings/break even stretches, so I'd like to see like 30-40k hands before making any serious considerations about my winrate, but even more is better.
JoeyFinngars
Thanks...
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2010 Invision Power Services, Inc.